Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Parks v. State

Parks v. State

575 So. 2d 276, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1258, 1991 WL 18251
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 595 So. 2d 1056 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 1991·No. No. 90-0788·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the imposition of costs in the sentence and remand so that the trial court may either strike the costs or conduct a hearing to impose costs. E.g. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parks v. State, 575 So. 2d 276, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1258, 1991 WL 18251 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

575 So. 2d 276 (Parks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)