Parks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Parks v. State

352 So. 2d 567, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16800

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 30, 1977

DocketNo. 77-881

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 352 So. 2d 567 (Parks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parks v. State, 352 So. 2d 567, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16800 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court revoking appellant’s probation, but we find that there is an imperfection in appellant’s sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975), requires. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). We remand the case in order for the trial court to correct the sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court revoking appellant’s probation, but we find that there is an imperfection in appellant’s sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975), requires. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). We remand the case in order for the trial court to correct the sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

352 So. 2d 567, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack