Parks v. State
This text of 37 Ark. 97 (Parks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Parks and Nathan Taylor, plaintiffs in error, were charged, tried and convicted before a justice of the peace of Yell county, Danville District, for an assault upon Annie Spears, with á deadly weapon, fined $1000 each, and costs, and ordered into custody, &c.
Without giving any bond, they caused a transcript to be filed in the Circuit Court as if upon appeal.
The State moved to dismiss the appeal because not taken in accordance with law; plaintiffs in error filed a petition under sections 926-31, Gantt’s Digest, to be allowed to prosecute their appeal without bond as paupers. The court refused the prayer of the petition and dismissed the appeal.
Plaintiffs in error could not appeal from the judgment of the justice of the peace without a covenant, by good security, for costs ; and a further covenant to pay the judgment if they desired to stay execution. Gantt’s Dig., Sec. 2104, &c.
Persons may be permitted to prosecute civil suits as paupers under the sections of the Digest above referred to, but they have no application to prosecutions of appeals in criminal cases.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 Ark. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-state-ark-1881.