Parks v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Parks v. Smith

94 Pa. 46, 1880 Pa. LEXIS 191

DecidedMarch 29, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 94 Pa. 46 (Parks v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parks v. Smith, 94 Pa. 46, 1880 Pa. LEXIS 191 (Pa. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered,

Per Curiam.

This case was submitted to the jury by the learned judge in the court below in a full and able charge, upon the principles settled to be applicable upon the question of fraud in law from retention of possession in McKibbin v. Martin, 14 P. F. Smith 352. It would have been manifest error if he had taken the case from the jury, as he was requested to do by the point presented by the defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered,

Per Curiam.

This case was submitted to the jury by the learned judge in the court below in a full and able charge, upon the principles settled to be applicable upon the question of fraud in law from retention of possession in McKibbin v. Martin, 14 P. F. Smith 352. It would have been manifest error if he had taken the case from the jury, as he was requested to do by the point presented by the defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 Pa. 46, 1880 Pa. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-smith-pa-1880.