Parks v. Provence Condominium Ass'n

761 So. 2d 1131, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5463
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 28, 1999
DocketNos. 97-1320, 97-4287
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 761 So. 2d 1131 (Parks v. Provence Condominium Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parks v. Provence Condominium Ass'n, 761 So. 2d 1131, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5463 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing. Case No. 97-4287 was previously consolidated with Case No. 97-1320 by court order. We, therefore, substitute the following for the decision issued March 3, 1999 to correct the style of the case and to include the per curiam affirmance of Case # 97-4287.

AFFIRMED.

DELL, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP v. Cedar Resources, Inc.
761 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
761 So. 2d 1131, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-provence-condominium-assn-fladistctapp-1999.