Parks v. Provence Condominium Ass'n

761 So. 2d 1131, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5463
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 1999·No. Nos. 97-1320, 97-4287·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing. Case No. 97-4287 was previously consolidated with Case No. 97-1320 by court order. We, therefore, substitute the following for the decision issued March 3, 1999 to correct the style of the case and to include the per curiam affirmance of Case # 97-4287.

AFFIRMED.

DELL, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parks v. Provence Condominium Ass'n, 761 So. 2d 1131, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5463 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

761 So. 2d 1131 (Parks v. Provence Condominium Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP v. Cedar Resources, Inc.
761 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)