Parks v. PetSmart

Fourth Circuit

Parks v. PetSmart

577 F. App'x 210

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2014·No. No. 14-1224·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michele P. Parks appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parks v. PetSmart, No. 5:13-cv-00777-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michele P. Parks appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parks v. PetSmart, No. 5:13-cv-00777-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Parks v. PetSmart, 577 F. App'x 210 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

577 F. App'x 210 (Parks v. PetSmart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.