Parks v. Parks
This text of 19 Abb. Pr. 161 (Parks v. Parks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case of Fellows and Hawes a. Niver (18 Wend., 563) is decisive of this case. In that case the court held that, the defendant having pleaded to the merits, he had waived the irregularity, and admitted that the plaintiffs were recti in cu/ria. The statute in relation to the appointment of guardians for infant parties, when that case was decided, was substantially the same as provided by the Code of Procedure.
Order appealed from reversed, with $10 costs.
Present, J. C. Smith, Wells, and E. Darwin Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Abb. Pr. 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-parks-nysupct-1865.