Parks v. Parks
19 Abb. Pr. 161
Opinion
The case of Fellows and Hawes a. Niver (18 Wend., 563) is decisive of this case. In that case the court held that, the defendant having pleaded to the merits, he had waived the irregularity, and admitted that the plaintiffs were recti in cu/ria. The statute in relation to the appointment of guardians for infant parties, when that case was decided, was substantially the same as provided by the Code of Procedure.
Order appealed from reversed, with $10 costs.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parks v. Parks, 19 Abb. Pr. 161 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1865).
19 Abb. Pr. 161 (Parks v. Parks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rima v. Rossie Iron Works
24 N.E. 940 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Gotendorf v. . Goldschmidt
83 N.Y. 110 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Daly v. Burchell
13 Abb. Pr. 264 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)
McMurray v. McMurray
9 Abb. Pr. 315 (New York Supreme Court, 1870)