Parks v. Hardwick

119 S.E. 220, 30 Ga. App. 673, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 617
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 26, 1923
Docket14667
StatusPublished

This text of 119 S.E. 220 (Parks v. Hardwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parks v. Hardwick, 119 S.E. 220, 30 Ga. App. 673, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 617 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where a person residing in DeKalb county is indicted in the superior court of Stewart county and gives bond for his appearance in that court (the sureties on the bond residing in Barrow county), the jurisdiction to forfeit the bond, upon the failure of the bail to appear in court at the designated time, is in the superior court of Stewart county. See, in this connection, Fryer v. State, 142 Ga. 83 (82 S. E. 496).

2. Under the above ruling and the agreed statement of facts, the court, sitting by consent without the intervention of a jury, did not err in striking the defendants’ special plea to the jurisdiction of the court, or in finding against their answer, or in rendering a judgment absolute against the sureties on the bond in question.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tucker v. Huson Ice & Machine Works
82 S.E. 496 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 S.E. 220, 30 Ga. App. 673, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-hardwick-gactapp-1923.