Parks v. Francoeur
This text of Parks v. Francoeur (Parks v. Francoeur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION Docket No.tV'-12-024
DANIEL PARKS,
Plaintiff ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S RULE 60(B) MOTION v.
ANDREW FRANCOEUR, \err.;_ ') c zn\ LL.-1 ,._ (J ~ U ~v- Defendant ;::~r:(;E~ ·vr:o Before the court is plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion. Plaintiff alleges newly
acquired evidence suggests fraudulent testimony was presented by defendant
and witness Paul Bois. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
The proposed testimony of Mr. Bois could have been discovered before
trial by inquiring whom plaintiff intended to call as witnesses. See In re Estate of
Fournier, 2009 ME 17, CJI 12, 996 A.2d 885. If the first notice that Mr. Bois would
testify came with the defendant's witness list, counsel could have approached the
court for an opportunity to depose Mr. Bois after the discovery deadline of
October 9, 2012. Defendant's witness list was filed December 10, 2012. Trial was
held August 27, 2013.
Most importantly, the proposed evidence would not change the result
upon a new trial. See id. This was a jury-waived trial. The court devoted one
sentence to Mr. Bois's testimony in the seven-page judgment. The court devoted
three pages in the Findings section of the judgment to plaintiff's testimony. The
court devoted two pages in the Conclusions section of the judgment to the
problems with plaintiff's ability to prove his case. The court specifically stated,
"plaintiff's testimony about the events of June 5, 2010 and thereafter was not credible, was exaggerated, and was, at times, theatrical." (1 I 9 I 14 Judgment at
7.) The court noted that the testimony of plaintiffs witness, Mr. Fickett was
given little weight. (Id.)
The plaintiff had the burden of proof. If defendant had moved for
judgment as a matter of law at the conclusion of plaintiff's case, the motion
would have been granted. M.R. Civ. P. SO(d).
The entry is
Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) Motion is DENIED.
Dated: February 26, 2015 cy Mills Justice, Superior Co
2 CLERK OF COURTS Cumberland County 205 Newbury Street, Ground Floor Portland, ME 04101
-:!}~nJc..n1' f'liio ---------··--··"·--·"-·----·---··-------·---- CLERK OF COURTS Cumberland County 205 Newbury Street, Ground Floor Portland, ME 04101 JOSEPH CAHOON ESQ ~\ ' •~ ' L\..l_L RICHARDSON WHITMAN LARGE & BADGER l (A\(\'\ 1 \ Tl \-l \ e;>\~~ PO BOX 9545 f PORTLAND ME 04112-9545
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Parks v. Francoeur, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-francoeur-mesuperct-2015.