Parks v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Parks v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

881 So. 2d 732, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13655, 2004 WL 2049740

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 15, 2004

DocketNo. 3D03-3399

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 881 So. 2d 732 (Parks v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parks v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 881 So. 2d 732, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13655, 2004 WL 2049740 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Deloris H. Parks, appeals from a final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission [UAC] affirming the decision of the appeals referee which denied her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

The appeals referee’s findings of fact are supported by competent substantial evidence, and therefore, the UAC properly adopted the findings of the appeals referee. Fink v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 665 So.2d 373, 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Based on those findings of facts, the UAC properly concluded that the claimant voluntarily left employment without good cause within the meaning of the unemployment compensation statute. Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Deloris H. Parks, appeals from a final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission [UAC] affirming the decision of the appeals referee which denied her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

The appeals referee’s findings of fact are supported by competent substantial evidence, and therefore, the UAC properly adopted the findings of the appeals referee. Fink v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 665 So.2d 373, 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Based on those findings of facts, the UAC properly concluded that the claimant voluntarily left employment without good cause within the meaning of the unemployment compensation statute. Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

881 So. 2d 732, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13655, 2004 WL 2049740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack