Parks v. EMC Mortgage Corp.

866 So. 2d 122, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1340, 2004 WL 384164
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 2004·No. No. 4D02-2734·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the issues raised by appellant and find them to be without merit. We therefore affirm the main appeal. We reverse on the cross-appeal for a correction of a scrivener’s error as to prejudgment interest, which should have been $35,724.74. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

POLEN, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parks v. EMC Mortgage Corp., 866 So. 2d 122, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1340, 2004 WL 384164 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

866 So. 2d 122 (Parks v. EMC Mortgage Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
866 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)