Parks v. Cooke

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Parks v. Cooke

51 N.E. 463, 170 Mass. 498, 1898 Mass. LEXIS 259

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 11, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 51 N.E. 463 (Parks v. Cooke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parks v. Cooke, 51 N.E. 463, 170 Mass. 498, 1898 Mass. LEXIS 259 (Mass. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Field, C. J.

The exceptions in this case do not raise the question whether any of the interrogatories contained in the second deposition called for incompetent evidence, or whether any of the answers thereto were incompetent. The single exception is to the admission of the second deposition in evidence, or at least of “ so much of the deposition as related to matters upon which the said Barbour had given testimony in his first deposition.” We think that the ruling was right. Akers v. Demond, 103 Mass. 318.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Field, C. J.

The exceptions in this case do not raise the question whether any of the interrogatories contained in the second deposition called for incompetent evidence, or whether any of the answers thereto were incompetent. The single exception is to the admission of the second deposition in evidence, or at least of “ so much of the deposition as related to matters upon which the said Barbour had given testimony in his first deposition.” We think that the ruling was right. Akers v. Demond, 103 Mass. 318.

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 N.E. 463, 170 Mass. 498, 1898 Mass. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-cooke-mass-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack