Parks v. Commissioner
This text of 201 F. App'x 553 (Parks v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Wayne Parks appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s dismissal of his “small tax” action. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Under I.R.C. § 746303), a decision entered in a “small tax” case “shall not be reviewed in any other court.” Cole v. Comm’r, 958 F.2d 288, 289 (9th Cir.1992); see also 26 U.S.C. § 7481(b). Because Parks’ case involved a disputed amount of less than $50,000 and he consented to its designation as a “small tax” case, we dismiss Parks’ appeal from the Tax Court’s decision. See 26 U.S.C. § 7463(a); Cole, 958 F.2d at 289-90.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 F. App'x 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-commissioner-ca9-2006.