Parks v. Commissioner

201 F. App'x 553
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 15, 2006·No. No. 05-70783·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Wayne Parks appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s dismissal of his “small tax” action. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Under I.R.C. § 746303), a decision entered in a “small tax” case “shall not be reviewed in any other court.” Cole v. Comm’r, 958 F.2d 288, 289 (9th Cir.1992); see also 26 U.S.C. § 7481(b). Because Parks’ case involved a disputed amount of less than $50,000 and he consented to its designation as a “small tax” case, we dismiss Parks’ appeal from the Tax Court’s decision. See 26 U.S.C. § 7463(a); Cole, 958 F.2d at 289-90.

DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parks v. Commissioner, 201 F. App'x 553 (9th Cir. 2006).

201 F. App'x 553 (Parks v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related