Parks v. City of Birmingham
This text of 431 So. 2d 542 (Parks v. City of Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of Harrelson v. Glisson, 424 So.2d 591 (Ala.1982); Double C. Productions, Inc. v. Exposition Enterprises, Inc., 404 So.2d 52 (Ala.1981); and Board of Water and Sewer Commissioners of the City of Mobile v. Merriwether Construction Company, Inc., 276 Ala. 650, 165 So.2d 739 (1964).
In affirming the trial court’s exercise of its discretionary authority, declining to issue a preliminary injunction, we note that our expeditious disposition of this case should allow the trial court to order this cause set for trial on its merits without further delay.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
431 So. 2d 542, 1983 Ala. LEXIS 4319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-city-of-birmingham-ala-1983.