Parks v. City of Atlanta

1 Ga. L. Rep. 336
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 23, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 336 (Parks v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parks v. City of Atlanta, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 336 (Ga. 1886).

Opinion

Jackson, C. J.

Where the fire-masters of a city employed a man at • will, and not for a year or any specified time, under a resolution adopted by them that, “ instead of electing, the men may be employed for the different positions, subject to the will of the board,” upon his discharge he could not recover against the city, or the members.of the board of fire-masters for his wages for the balance of the year; and such facts appearing from the plaintiff’s evidence, a non-suit was proper.

(a) There being no proof of damage to character and standing or loss of service, no verdict could have been rendered therefor, and a non-suit was right.

(b) It is unnecessary to consider how far the resolution of the board was restricted by the ordinance of the council.

(c) What was said to plaintiff by others than his employers was - inadmissible, and custom could not affect his rights under his contract in this case, not being such as to enter into his contract at the time it • was made.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-city-of-atlanta-ga-1886.