Parks v. Blanchester Bd. of Pub. Affairs
This text of 2022 Ohio 319 (Parks v. Blanchester Bd. of Pub. Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Parks v. Blanchester Bd. of Pub. Affairs, 2022-Ohio-319.]
JOSHUA PARKS Case No. 2021-00524PQ
Requester Judge Patrick E. Sheeran
v. JUDGMENT ENTRY
BLANCHESTER BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, VILLAGE OF BLANCHESTER
Respondent
{¶1} On December 22, 2021, a Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation in this public-records case. The Special Master recommends (1) denying the claim for production of records and (2) assessing costs to Requester. {¶2} Neither party has timely filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation, as permitted by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects to a special master’s report and recommendation, then this Court is required to “promptly issue a final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” {¶3} The Court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation of December 22, 2021. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Court costs are assessed to Requester. The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.
PATRICK E. SHEERAN Judge Filed January 11, 2022 Sent to S.C. Reporter 2/4/22
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 Ohio 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-blanchester-bd-of-pub-affairs-ohioctcl-2022.