Parks v. Andrews

New York Supreme Court

Parks v. Andrews

51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940

DecidedFebruary 23, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940 (Parks v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parks v. Andrews, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order revei sed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that the exceptions taken to the admission of the evidence of Grant Andrews and May Potter as to the declarations of their father present error. See Holcomb v. Holcomb, 95 N. Y., 316; Matter of E saman, 113 id., 62; 22 St. Rep., 136; Matter of the Will of Dunham, 121 N. Y., 575; 31 St. Rep., 858. 2. After excluding such evidence the verdict and decision are against the weight of evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order revei sed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that the exceptions taken to the admission of the evidence of Grant Andrews and May Potter as to the declarations of their father present error. See Holcomb v. Holcomb, 95 N. Y., 316; Matter of E saman, 113 id., 62; 22 St. Rep., 136; Matter of the Will of Dunham, 121 N. Y., 575; 31 St. Rep., 858. 2. After excluding such evidence the verdict and decision are against the weight of evidence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-andrews-nysupct-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack