Parks v. Andrews
23 N.Y.S. 1153, 67 Hun 650, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 650
Opinion
No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event: Held: (1) That the exceptions taken to the admission of the evidence of Grant Andrews and May Potter as to the declarations of their father present error. See Holcomb v. Holcomb, 95 N. Y. 316; In re Eysaman, 113 N. Y. 62, 20 N. E. Rep. 613; In re Dunham, 121 N. Y. 575, 24 N. E. Rep. 932. (2) After excluding such evidence the verdict and decision are against the weight of evidence. See 10 N. Y. Supp. 344.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parks v. Andrews, 23 N.Y.S. 1153, 67 Hun 650, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 650 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
23 N.Y.S. 1153 (Parks v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Eysaman
20 N.E. 613 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Dunham
24 N.E. 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Holcomb v. . Holcomb
95 N.Y. 316 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Parks v. Andrews
10 N.Y.S. 344 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)