Parks Harris v. George P. Dodson

Fourth Circuit

Parks Harris v. George P. Dodson

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17377, 1995 WL 295493

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 16, 1995

Docket94-6911

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 773 (Parks Harris v. George P. Dodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parks Harris v. George P. Dodson, 54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17377, 1995 WL 295493 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Parks HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
George P. DODSON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-6911.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 16, 1995.

Parks Harris, appellant pro se.

Gregory E. Lucyk, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Dodson, No. CA-93-771 (E.D. Va. July 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Parks HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
George P. DODSON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-6911.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 16, 1995.

Parks Harris, appellant pro se.

Gregory E. Lucyk, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Dodson, No. CA-93-771 (E.D. Va. July 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17377, 1995 WL 295493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-harris-v-george-p-dodson-ca4-1995.