Park's Administrator v. Willis

District of Columbia

Park's Administrator v. Willis

1 D.C. 357

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 357 (Park's Administrator v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Park's Administrator v. Willis, 1 D.C. 357 (D.D.C. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

refused to permit the deposition to be read. (See Voss v. Luke, July term, 1806, [ante, 331]; Woods & Bemis v. Young, July term, 1806, [ante, 346,] and Lewis v. Mandeville, [post, 360.]

The plaintiff then offered to read a deposition of John Hand, taken by the defendant, and filed in the cause, after having proved that Hand sailed for Philadelphia about three weeks ago, and had not returned. No subpoena had been issued for him.

The Court permitted it to be read.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

refused to permit the deposition to be read. (See Voss v. Luke, July term, 1806, [ante, 331]; Woods & Bemis v. Young, July term, 1806, [ante, 346,] and Lewis v. Mandeville, [post, 360.]

The plaintiff then offered to read a deposition of John Hand, taken by the defendant, and filed in the cause, after having proved that Hand sailed for Philadelphia about three weeks ago, and had not returned. No subpoena had been issued for him.

The Court permitted it to be read.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-administrator-v-willis-dcd-1806.