Parkinson v. Wentworth
11 Mass. 26
Opinion
The plea is certainly bad in point of form. It should have concluded by praying judgment that the plaintiff be barred of his action until, &c.
* Since, however, the point is of a public nature, the [ * 27 ] defendant may plead anew, paying costs of the action to this time.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parkinson v. Wentworth, 11 Mass. 26 (Mass. 1814).
11 Mass. 26 (Parkinson v. Wentworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manaka v. Monterey Sardine Industries, Inc.
48 F. Supp. 625 (N.D. California, 1942)
Janusis v. Long
188 N.E. 228 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Dwyer v. Wiese
193 Iowa 208 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1922)
Sparks v. Dispatch Transfer Co.
104 Mo. 531 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Devendorf v. West Virginia Oil & Oil Land Co.
17 W. Va. 135 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1880)