Parkinson v. Wentworth
This text of 11 Mass. 26 (Parkinson v. Wentworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plea is certainly bad in point of form. It should have concluded by praying judgment that the plaintiff be barred of his action until, &c.
* Since, however, the point is of a public nature, the [ * 27 ] defendant may plead anew, paying costs of the action to this time.
If a neutral become an enemy pending the suit, this should be pleaded in abatement, as it only suspends the action. — 1 Chitty, 514, 7th ed. — 3 Chitty, 911. — 15 East, 260. — Harmer vs. Kingston, 3 Camp. 153. — Levine vs. Taylor, 12 Mass. Rep. 8. — Hutchinson vs. Brock, post, 119. — Langdon § Al. vs. Potter, post, 113. — It seems the plea in many cases may be either in bar or in abatement. — 1 Chitty, 481 514.—3 Chitty, 911, 7th ed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Mass. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parkinson-v-wentworth-mass-1814.