Parkinson v. Syracuse Transit Corp.
This text of 279 A.D. 848 (Parkinson v. Syracuse Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum: Evidence of prior accidents, involving the driver, to establish negligence of the driver at the time of this accident would 'be incompetent. Proof of the fact that defendant knew of prior accidents of the driver, absent proof of the driver’s negligence on this occasion, would not make out a case for the plaintiff. An examination as to the training and experience of the driver will amply disclose his competency or incompeteney to operate a bus. All concur. (Appeal from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for an examination before trial of defendant, and directing defendant to produce certain books and papers.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 848, 109 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parkinson-v-syracuse-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1952.