Parkhurst v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:23-cv-00060-WCM
TINA PARKHURST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER v. ) ) COMMISSIONER OF ) THE SOCIAL SECURITY ) ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ )
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (the “Motion,” Doc. 18). Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), the Court must award attorney’s fees to a prevailing party (other than the United States) in a civil action brought against the United States unless the Court finds that the Government’s position was “substantially justified” or that “special circumstances” would make such an award unjust. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). Because the Court ordered that this case be remanded to the Social Security Administration, Plaintiff is properly considered a “prevailing party” in this action. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 2635, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993); Docs. 16, 17. An award of attorney’s fees under the EAJA must be reasonable. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(A). It is within the Court’s discretion to award attorney’s fees
above the statutory hourly rate. See Payne v. Sullivan, 977 F.2d 900, 903 (4th Cir. 1992). The Motion seeks an award of $6,800.00 in attorney fees, representing a compromised settlement amount between the parties, and $402.00 in filing
fees. Doc. 18 at 1.1 Plaintiff’s counsel has also submitted a summary of time spent on this action. Doc. 19-1. After review and consideration of the Motion, the supporting documents, and applicable authorities, the Court will allow the Motion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. 18) is GRANTED IN PART, and Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of
$6,800.00 and costs and expenses in the amount of $402.00 (“Fee Award”). (2) As EAJA fees belong to the litigant and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, see Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586,
1 Although the definition of “fees and expenses” under the EAJA does not include filing fees, see 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A), fees of the Clerk may be taxed as costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and the cost statute is expressly incorporated into § 2412(a)(1). 589 (2010), the Fee Award shall be paid by Defendant as follows:
a. If Plaintiff has federal debt registered with the Department of the Treasury that may be offset by the Fee Award, such amount of the Fee Award as is necessary to satisfy Plaintiffs federal debt shall be so used, up to and including the entire amount of the Fee Award. b. The remaining balance of the Fee Award after application of the offset, if any, described above shall be delivered by Defendant to Plaintiff's counsel on behalf of Plaintiff.
Signed: December 10, 2024
W. Carleton Metcalf fr United States Magistrate Judge ‘elle
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parkhurst v. Commissioner of Social Security (Parkhurst v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.