Parker v. Williams

Saratoga Chancery Court

Parker v. Williams

1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 26, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 303

DecidedMarch 16, 1841

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 26 (Parker v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Saratoga Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Williams, 1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 26, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 303 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

Decided in this case that the court will not listen to an objection that the complainant had a perfect remedy at law after *the parties have proceeded to a hearing upon pleadings and proofs. That a prayer, in an answer, that the defendant may have the same benefit as if he had demurred, without stating the nature of the objection to the relief sought by the bill, is not sufficient to apprise the complainant that the defendant intends to insist upon the objection that the remedy at law is perfect. Decree appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decided in this case that the court will not listen to an objection that the complainant had a perfect remedy at law after *the parties have proceeded to a hearing upon pleadings and proofs. That a prayer, in an answer, that the defendant may have the same benefit as if he had demurred, without stating the nature of the objection to the relief sought by the bill, is not sufficient to apprise the complainant that the defendant intends to insist upon the objection that the remedy at law is perfect. Decree appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 26, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-williams-nychanctsara-1841.