Parker v. . Webb

161 S.E. 730, 202 N.C. 818, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 236
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 8, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 730 (Parker v. . Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. . Webb, 161 S.E. 730, 202 N.C. 818, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 236 (N.C. 1932).

Opinion

The court below rendered the following judgment: "This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned judge upon the demurrer filed by the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, to the answer or cross-complaint of the defendants, H. W. and J. C. Webb, and the court being of the opinion that no cause of action is stated against the defendant, the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland; It is, therefore, ordered that the demurrer be sustained and that the defendant, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, go without day and recover its costs. F. A. Daniels, judge presiding."

"To the foregoing judgment the plaintiffs and the defendants, H. W. and J. C. Webb, except, and give notice of appeal to the Supreme Court."

The only exception and assignment of error was to the judgment as rendered by the court below. An eminent and able judge in the court below sustained the demurrer, after hearing arguments of counsel on the questions of law involved.

The proviso in C. S., 1416, is as follows: "Provided that the justices shall not be required to write their opinion in full except in cases in which they deem it necessary." The filing of a written opinion in a case is discretionary with the Supreme Court. Bradsher v. Cheek, 112 N.C. 838; S.v. Council, 129 N.C. 511; Parker v. R. R., 133 N.C. 335.

From a careful reading of the record and the briefs of the litigants, we think the judgment of the court below sustaining the demurrer correct. The judgment below is

Affirmed. *Page 819

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradsher v. . Cheek
17 S.E. 533 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)
Parker v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
63 L.R.A. 827 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 730, 202 N.C. 818, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-webb-nc-1932.