Parker v. Webb

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Parker v. Webb

89 S.E. 606, 18 Ga. App. 479, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1031

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 27, 1916

Docket7288

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 606 (Parker v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Webb, 89 S.E. 606, 18 Ga. App. 479, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1031 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The court did not err in admitting, or in afterwards refusing to exclude, certain testimony, as complained of in the first and second grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

2. The refusal of the court to award a nonsuit will not be considered, since the case proceeded to a verdict, and exceptions were taken to the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which contained the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it.

3. While there are some slight inaccuracies in the excerpts from the charge complained of, yet, when considered in connection with the entire charge, they do not contain any error requiring a new trial.

4. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI