Parker v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
This text of 84 A.2d 68 (Parker v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an application for leave to appeal from the refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. The applicant and two joint defendants were tried and convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore upon a charge of robbery with a deadly weapon. Each defendant received an indeterminate sentence of ten years.
The applicant alleges that he was unable to employ counsel, but admits that he was represented by counsel appointed by the court. He plead guilty to the charge. [681]*681He complains that the other defendants subsequently obtained “acts of mitigation”, presumably reduction of sentence, but he does not state what the mitigation was, through what agency it was obtained, or any facts that would entitle him to similar relief. Cf. Coleman v. Warden, 198 Md. 678, 81 A (2) 460. As we said in that case, “a prisoner can always seek a reduction in sentence by applying to the Division of Parole and Probation”.
Application denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.2d 68, 198 Md. 680, 1951 Md. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1951.