Parker v. Wakeman
10 Paige Ch. 485
Opinion
denied the application, upon the ground that the act complained of was not such a breach of the injunction as would authorize the complainants to proceed against the defendant for a contempt. He said it could not possibly injure them in the collection of their debt, and was apparently for their benefit; and that it was not an inter-meddling with the defendant’s property within the spirit and intent of the injunction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parker v. Wakeman, 10 Paige Ch. 485 (N.Y. 1843).
10 Paige Ch. 485 (Parker v. Wakeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Diedrich
30 N.E. 1038 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
Van Wagonen v. . Terpenning
25 N.E. 254 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Ex parte Holton
69 Ala. 164 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1881)
Wilkinson v. First National Fire Insurance Co. of Worcester
72 N.Y. 499 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)