Parker v. Virginia Beach Public Defenders Office

Fourth Circuit

Parker v. Virginia Beach Public Defenders Office

465 F. App'x 285

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2012·No. No. 11-7505·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Parker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. Virginia Pub. Defender, No. 2:11-cv-00466-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [286]*286presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Parker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. Virginia Pub. Defender, No. 2:11-cv-00466-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [286]*286presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Parker v. Virginia Beach Public Defenders Office, 465 F. App'x 285 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

465 F. App'x 285 (Parker v. Virginia Beach Public Defenders Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related