Parker v. Tax Commission

278 U.S. 566, 49 S. Ct. 78, 73 L. Ed. 509, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 16
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 19, 1928·No. No. 52; No. 53·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per. Curiam:

The writs of error are dismissed for want of a properly presénted substantial -federal question, on the authority of (1) St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. Co. v. Shephard, 240 U. S. 240; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City [567] of Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1; (2) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry., 228 U. S. 326; Marvin v. Trout, 199 U. S. 212.

Mr. Horace Andrews, with whom Messrs. Marion V. Semple and T. G. Thompson were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Virgil H. Gibbs, with whom Mr. Edward C. Turner was on the brief, for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Tax Commission, 278 U.S. 566, 49 S. Ct. 78, 73 L. Ed. 509, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 16 (1928).

278 U.S. 566 (Parker v. Tax Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Squier v. Martin
24 A.2d 865 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Thayer-Martin
192 A. 74 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Pflueger v. Sherman
75 F.2d 84 (Ninth Circuit, 1935)
Mittry Bros. Const. Co. v. United States
75 F.2d 79 (Ninth Circuit, 1934)