Parker v. Strauss & Co.

22 So. 329, 49 La. Ann. 1173, 1897 La. LEXIS 413
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 10, 1897·No. No. 12,411·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

The opinion of the court on motion to dismiss was delivered by

Miller, J.

The defendants move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the amount is insufficient to give this court jurisdiction, [1174] and the record does not show that the constitutionality or legality of the tax claim is involved.

The record shows that the tax collector, proceeding by rule to compel the delivery of personal property assessed for taxes, is met by the defence that defendants in rule have no property within the jurisdiction of the court liable to taxation. We think this answer substantially puts at issue the legality of the tax and this appreciation of the- defence is confirmed by the argument of defendants against the right of the State to tax the personal property of defendants, because the property is on deposit in the bank.

We see no ground to dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Strauss & Co., 22 So. 329, 49 La. Ann. 1173, 1897 La. LEXIS 413 (La. 1897).

22 So. 329 (Parker v. Strauss & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Adams v. Said Estate
167 Iowa 382 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1914)
National Fire Ins. v. Board of Assessors
46 So. 117 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)
General Electric Co. v. Board of Assessors
46 So. 122 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)
New York Life Ins. v. Board of Assessors for the Parish of Orleans
158 F. 462 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana, 1908)
Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Board of Assessors
39 So. 846 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)
New Orleans v. Stempel
175 U.S. 309 (Supreme Court, 1899)