Parker v. State
45 A. 1092, 62 N.J.L. 801, 33 Vroom 801, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 113
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Van Syckel, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parker v. State, 45 A. 1092, 62 N.J.L. 801, 33 Vroom 801, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 113 (N.J. 1899).
45 A. 1092 (Parker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Vinegra
376 A.2d 150 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)
People v. Modesto
398 P.2d 753 (California Supreme Court, 1965)
State v. Corby
145 A.2d 289 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)
State v. Corby
136 A.2d 271 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
State v. O'LEARY
135 A.2d 321 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)
State v. Kobylarz
130 A.2d 80 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
State v. Wise
115 A.2d 62 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955)
State v. De Meo
113 A.2d 688 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
State v. Marinella
93 A.2d 620 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
State v. Wilson
93 A.2d 412 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
State v. Edelman
88 A.2d 516 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
State v. Morriggi
83 A.2d 612 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
State v. DiBenedetto
82 A. 521 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1912)