Parker v. State

64 S.E.2d 475, 83 Ga. App. 681, 1951 Ga. App. LEXIS 934
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 3, 1951·No. 33374, 33375, 33376·Published

Opinion

MacIntyre, P.J.

Where, upon a trial for assault with intent to murder, the defendant in his statement to the jury admits firing at the prosecutor but claims the shot was fired in self-defense and under circumstances of justification with no intention to kill, but there is evidence authorizing the jury to disbelieve the defendant’s claim of self-defense and circumstances of justification, this court will not, upon a motion for a new trial based solely upon the general grounds, disturb a verdict finding the defendant guilty of shooting at another; not in his own defense. Close v. State, 70 Ga. App. 498 (28 S. E. 2d, 672); Barnes v. State, 71 Ga. App. 9 (29 S. E. 2d, 919); Battle v. State, 73 Ga. App. 476 (36 S. E. 2d, 873); Fallon v. State, 5 Ga. App. 659 (63 S. E. 806). The court did not err in overruling the motions for a new trial.

Judgments affirmed.

Gardner and Townsend, JJ., concur. Edward J. Goodwin, for plaintiff in error. Andrew J. Ryan Jr., Solicitor-General, Sylvan A. Garfunkel, Herman W. Coolidge, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. State, 64 S.E.2d 475, 83 Ga. App. 681, 1951 Ga. App. LEXIS 934 (Ga. Ct. App. 1951).

64 S.E.2d 475 (Parker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Close v. State
28 S.E.2d 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Battle v. State
36 S.E.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Barnes v. State
29 S.E.2d 919 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Fallon v. State
63 S.E. 806 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)