Parker v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Parker v. . Smith

18 S.E.2d 118, 220 N.C. 821, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 554

DecidedJanuary 7, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 18 S.E.2d 118 (Parker v. . Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. . Smith, 18 S.E.2d 118, 220 N.C. 821, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 554 (N.C. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Thessaly Manning and Robert Phillips appealed from an order of the judge holding March Term, 1941, of Moore Superior Court, setting aside a separate judgment against the plaintiff obtained by default on their counterclaims to • plaintiff’s cause of action, on the ground of excusable neglect. C. S., 600.

Upon a careful examination of the record we are of opinion the matter was within the jurisdiction of the court and in accordance with recognized procedure. The appeal discloses no sufficient reasons why the order setting aside the default judgment should be disturbed, and it is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Thessaly Manning and Robert Phillips appealed from an order of the judge holding March Term, 1941, of Moore Superior Court, setting aside a separate judgment against the plaintiff obtained by default on their counterclaims to • plaintiff’s cause of action, on the ground of excusable neglect. C. S., 600.

Upon a careful examination of the record we are of opinion the matter was within the jurisdiction of the court and in accordance with recognized procedure. The appeal discloses no sufficient reasons why the order setting aside the default judgment should be disturbed, and it is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 S.E.2d 118, 220 N.C. 821, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-smith-nc-1942.