Parker v. Senate of the State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Parker v. Senate of the State

210 So. 3d 270, 2017 La. LEXIS 428

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 24, 2017

DocketNO. 2016-CA-1690

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 So. 3d 270 (Parker v. Senate of the State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Senate of the State, 210 So. 3d 270, 2017 La. LEXIS 428 (La. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

|-i Rehearing granted. In our January 13, 2017 disposition, we concluded we were deprived of appellate jurisdiction pursuant to La. Const. Art. V, § 5(D) because the underlying dispute forming the basis for the constitutional challenge was rendered moot. However, we find the district court’s June 15, 2014 judgment may have some collateral impact on non-constitutional aspects of the case, such as plaintiffs’ ability to recover attorney fees.

Accordingly, rehearing is granted for the sole purpose of transferring this ap[271]*271peal to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit where it may be consolidated with other pending appeals as appropriate. In all other respects, our order of January 13, 2017 is affirmed.

WEUNER, J., would grant and docket. HUGHES, J., would grant and docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

|-i Rehearing granted. In our January 13, 2017 disposition, we concluded we were deprived of appellate jurisdiction pursuant to La. Const. Art. V, § 5(D) because the underlying dispute forming the basis for the constitutional challenge was rendered moot. However, we find the district court’s June 15, 2014 judgment may have some collateral impact on non-constitutional aspects of the case, such as plaintiffs’ ability to recover attorney fees.

Accordingly, rehearing is granted for the sole purpose of transferring this ap[271]*271peal to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit where it may be consolidated with other pending appeals as appropriate. In all other respects, our order of January 13, 2017 is affirmed.

WEUNER, J., would grant and docket. HUGHES, J., would grant and docket.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 So. 3d 270, 2017 La. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-senate-of-the-state-la-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack