Parker v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Parker v. Rosenberg

229 A.D. 726

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 229 A.D. 726 (Parker v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Rosenberg, 229 A.D. 726 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed [727]*727upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The record does not, in our opinion, show any good reason why a receiver should be appointed under the agreement involved in this action. The assets are quite small and there is no pretense that the defendant corporation is insolvent and a receivership would simply add an unnecessary expense to this litigation. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed [727]*727upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The record does not, in our opinion, show any good reason why a receiver should be appointed under the agreement involved in this action. The assets are quite small and there is no pretense that the defendant corporation is insolvent and a receivership would simply add an unnecessary expense to this litigation. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D. 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-rosenberg-nyappdiv-1930.