Parker v. Roberson

86 S.E.2d 75, 241 N.C. 612, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 416
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 9, 1955·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“The rule that a judgment is in fieri during the term only and cannot be altered after adjournment relates to judicial and not to clerical errors therein.” Land Bank v. Davis, 215 N.C. 100, 1 S.E. 2d 350.

“The power of the Superior Court, on motion in the cause after notice, to correct clerical errors in the judgment and to make the record speak the truth may not be denied.” Land Bank v. Cherry, 227 N.C. 105, 40 S.E. 2d 799.

The error in the judgment entered at March Term, 1954, plainly disclosed by the record itself, is an obvious clerical error. Judge Carr’s judgment was the appropriate procedure to correct such error. The assignment of error, upon which defendants’ appeal is based, is wholly without merit. The judgment of Judge Carr is

Affirmed.

Barnhill, C. J., and DeviN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Roberson, 86 S.E.2d 75, 241 N.C. 612, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 416 (N.C. 1955).

86 S.E.2d 75 (Parker v. Roberson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

N. C. Joint Stock Land Bank v. Cherry
40 S.E.2d 799 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Davis
1 S.E.2d 350 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)