Parker v. Rathjen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Parker v. Rathjen

228 A.D.2d 424, 643 N.Y.2d 417, 643 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6221

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 424 (Parker v. Rathjen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Rathjen, 228 A.D.2d 424, 643 N.Y.2d 417, 643 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendants Citibank, N. A., and Citicorp Mortgage, Inc., for summary judgment, as the plaintiff was collaterally estopped from relitigating the issue of his fraud (see, Citibank v Rathjen, 202 AD2d 235). In any event, the plaintiff’s claim raised no triable issue of fact.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendants Citibank, N. A., and Citicorp Mortgage, Inc., for summary judgment, as the plaintiff was collaterally estopped from relitigating the issue of his fraud (see, Citibank v Rathjen, 202 AD2d 235). In any event, the plaintiff’s claim raised no triable issue of fact.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 A.D.2d 424, 643 N.Y.2d 417, 643 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-rathjen-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack