Parker v. Rathjen
228 A.D.2d 424, 643 N.Y.2d 417, 643 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6221
Opinion
The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendants Citibank, N. A., and Citicorp Mortgage, Inc., for summary judgment, as the plaintiff was collaterally estopped from relitigating the issue of his fraud (see, Citibank v Rathjen, 202 AD2d 235). In any event, the plaintiff’s claim raised no triable issue of fact.
The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parker v. Rathjen, 228 A.D.2d 424, 643 N.Y.2d 417, 643 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 424 (Parker v. Rathjen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Citibank, N.A. v. Rathjen
202 A.D.2d 235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)