Parker v. Prescott

27 A. 343, 85 Me. 435
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMay 20, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 27 A. 343 (Parker v. Prescott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Prescott, 27 A. 343, 85 Me. 435 (Me. 1893).

Opinion

Walton, J.

This is a writ of entry. The plaintiff claims title through an attachment and levy; and the only question is whether the plaintiff, at the time of the attachment, had actual notice of the existence of an unrecorded deed.

The evidence of such notice is very unsatisfactory. But the jury, nevertheless, found in favor of the defendant, which shows that, in their judgment, the plaintiff had such notice.

Is the verdict so clearly wrong as to require us to set it aside ? The presiding justice before whom the case was tried (Virgin) thinks it is. We have read the evidence very carefully, and we are of the same opinion.

Motion sustained.

Peters, C. J., Virgin, Emery, Foster and Haskell, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A. 343, 85 Me. 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-prescott-me-1893.