Parker v. Parker

133 S.E. 292, 35 Ga. App. 425, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 415
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1926
Docket16955
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 292 (Parker v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Parker, 133 S.E. 292, 35 Ga. App. 425, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 415 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

1. “Under repeated decisions of this court and of the Supreme Court, each special ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete and understandable within itself, without reference to the brief of evidence or to any other part of the record.” Gaskins v. Courson, 34 Ga. App. 420 (129 S. E. 920). Under the rule stated, it is not permissible to deal with the special ground of the motion for a new trial in this case.

2.. The evidence being in conflict so that a finding for either party would have been authorized, the verdict can not be set aside on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaskins v. Courson
129 S.E. 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 292, 35 Ga. App. 425, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-parker-gactapp-1926.