Parker v. Parker

133 S.E. 292, 35 Ga. App. 425, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 415
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 14, 1926·No. 16955·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

1. “Under repeated decisions of this court and of the Supreme Court, each special ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete and understandable within itself, without reference to the brief of evidence or to any other part of the record.” Gaskins v. Courson, 34 Ga. App. 420 (129 S. E. 920). Under the rule stated, it is not permissible to deal with the special ground of the motion for a new trial in this case.

2.. The evidence being in conflict so that a finding for either party would have been authorized, the verdict can not be set aside on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Parker, 133 S.E. 292, 35 Ga. App. 425, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 415 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

133 S.E. 292 (Parker v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaskins v. Courson
129 S.E. 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)