Parker v. Parker
39 Ala. 347
Opinion
A. ~F. WALKER, 0. ~L-
This is a suit against two defendants. The su~mmons anct complaint were served on one, and returned not found as to the other. There was no discontinuance as to the party not served. Judgment by defai± was rendered against both. In rendering the judgment by default against the two defendants, upon one whom there was no service, the court erred.-Smith & Howell v. Winthrop, Minor, 425; Driver & Shelley v. Spence, 3 Ala. 98; Norwood & Chambers v. Riddle, 9 Porter, 425; Faver & Mount v. Briggs, 18 Ala. 478.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parker v. Parker, 39 Ala. 347 (Ala. 1864).
39 Ala. 347 (Parker v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Krasner v. Gurley
29 So. 2d 224 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)
Windham v. National Fertilizer. Co.
99 Ala. 578 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)