Parker v. Parker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Parker v. Parker

39 Ala. 347

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 15, 1864

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 39 Ala. 347 (Parker v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Parker, 39 Ala. 347 (Ala. 1864).

Pincite

Opinion

A. ~F. WALKER, 0. ~L-

This is a suit against two defendants. The su~mmons anct complaint were served on one, and returned not found as to the other. There was no discontinuance as to the party not served. Judgment by defai± was rendered against both. In rendering the judgment by default against the two defendants, upon one whom there was no service, the court erred.-Smith & Howell v. Winthrop, Minor, 425; Driver & Shelley v. Spence, 3 Ala. 98; Norwood & Chambers v. Riddle, 9 Porter, 425; Faver & Mount v. Briggs, 18 Ala. 478.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. ~F. WALKER, 0. ~L-

This is a suit against two defendants. The su~mmons anct complaint were served on one, and returned not found as to the other. There was no discontinuance as to the party not served. Judgment by defai± was rendered against both. In rendering the judgment by default against the two defendants, upon one whom there was no service, the court erred.-Smith & Howell v. Winthrop, Minor, 425; Driver & Shelley v. Spence, 3 Ala. 98; Norwood & Chambers v. Riddle, 9 Porter, 425; Faver & Mount v. Briggs, 18 Ala. 478.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Ala. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-parker-ala-1864.

Opinion

A. ~F. WALKER, 0. ~L-

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack