Parker v. Oliver Farm Equipment Co.

32 S.W.2d 968
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 13, 1930
DocketNo. 3903.
StatusPublished

This text of 32 S.W.2d 968 (Parker v. Oliver Farm Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Oliver Farm Equipment Co., 32 S.W.2d 968 (Tex. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

WILDSON, O. J.

(after stating the case as above).

There are no assignments of error in the record sent this court nor anything showing such assignments to have been filed in the court below as required by the statute. Article 1844, R. S. 1925. If such assignments were ever so filed, they not only were not made a part of said record, but they were not copied into appellant’s brief as rule 32 for the government of Courts of Civil Appeals required they should be. It has been many times held that when an appellant has failed to comply with said requirements, only errors “apparent upon the face of the record” can be considered by an appellate court. Gladney v. Pate (Tex. Civ. App.) 29 S.W.(2d) 794; Dawhorn v. Kirkpatrick (Tex. Civ. App.) 26 S.W.(2d) 658; Dawes v. Irr. Dist. (Tex. Civ. App.) 25 S. W. 907; Yandle v. Mundy (Tex. Civ. App.) 22 S.W.(2d) 983. Having examined the record without finding an error of that kind, it follows from what has been said that we cannot do otherwise, than affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gladney v. Pate
29 S.W.2d 794 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 S.W.2d 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-oliver-farm-equipment-co-texapp-1930.