Parker v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court

Parker v. Oklahoma

540 U.S. 978, 124 S. Ct. 476

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 3, 2003

Docket03-6138

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 540 U.S. 978 (Parker v. Oklahoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Oklahoma, 540 U.S. 978, 124 S. Ct. 476 (2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 U.S. 978, 124 S. Ct. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-oklahoma-scotus-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack