Parker v. Nguyen

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 11, 2020·No. Civil Action No. 2020-0597·Published

Opinion

FILED

6/11/2020

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Court for the District of Columbia FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BRENDA PARKER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 20-597 (UNA)

)

JOHN NGUYEN et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a motion, ECF No. 5, which the Court has liberally

construed as brought pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for relief

from the dismissal order entered on March 9, 2020, ECF No. 4. This case was dismissed on the

jurisdictional ground that this Court cannot review the decisions of its sister court in Indiana.

See Mem. Op., ECF No. 3. The instant motion in no way suggests a cure for the jurisdictional

defect. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion will be denied by separate order.

SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: June 11, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Nguyen, (D.D.C. 2020).

Parker v. Nguyen (Parker v. Nguyen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.