Parker v. Marvell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Parker v. Marvell

60 N.H. 30

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 N.H. 30 (Parker v. Marvell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Marvell, 60 N.H. 30 (N.H. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

BlN<jj^J\í, J.

The arrangement was a secret inference of law. Coburn v. Pickering, pson, 43 N. H. 130; Coolidge v. Me Stockwell, 55 N. H. 561; Cutting v. Jackson, 56 N. Holmes, 58 N. H. 293; Flagg v. Pierce, 58 N. no satisfactory explanation of the vendor’s posses-was in Towne v. Rice, 59 N. H. 412, and French v. Hall, 9 H. 137. The wagon was used by the vendor for more than a yeai\ and from ordinary observation a neighbor or creditor would have supposed it to be the vendor’s property.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Allen, J.,. did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BlN<jj^J\í, J.

The arrangement was a secret inference of law. Coburn v. Pickering, pson, 43 N. H. 130; Coolidge v. Me Stockwell, 55 N. H. 561; Cutting v. Jackson, 56 N. Holmes, 58 N. H. 293; Flagg v. Pierce, 58 N. no satisfactory explanation of the vendor’s posses-was in Towne v. Rice, 59 N. H. 412, and French v. Hall, 9 H. 137. The wagon was used by the vendor for more than a yeai\ and from ordinary observation a neighbor or creditor would have supposed it to be the vendor’s property.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Allen, J.,. did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 N.H. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-marvell-nh-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack