Parker v. Martin

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma·Decided July 15, 2025·No. 5:25-cv-00504·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

KIONTAE LAWAYNE PARKER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- ) NO. CIV-25-0504-HE ) BLAKE MARTIN, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER On June 13, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Amanda L. Maxfield issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending the court dismiss plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice to re-filing for his failure to pay the initial partial filing fee. She advised plaintiff of his right to file an objection to the Report and Recommendation on or before July 7, 2025. In addition, she advised plaintiff of the consequences for his failure to file a timely objection. To date, plaintiff has not filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff therefore has waived the right to appellate review of the factual and legal questions contained in the Report and Recommendation. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #42]. Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-filing for failure to pay the initial partial filing fee. A separate judgment will be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 15th day of July, 2025.

lhl AAMY, JO ATON D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Martin, (W.D. Okla. 2025).

Parker v. Martin (Parker v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dennis Wayne Moore v. United States
950 F.2d 656 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)