Parker v. Marlboro Cotton Mills

103 S.E. 512, 114 S.C. 156, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 105
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 28, 1920·No. 10421·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

This is an appeal from an order of nonsuit. The allegations of the cómplaint material to the question involved are contained in the third and fourth paragraphs. The answer denied these allegations, and set up the defenses of assumpof risk and contributory and gross negligence." At the close of the plaintiff’s testimony, his Honor, the presiding Judge, granted a nonsuit, on the ground that the plaintiff was confronted with two courses, one of which he knew to be dangerous, nevertheless he pursued the other. ‘

There was testimony tending to sustain the allegations of the complaint. Therefore, the question of proximate cause should have been submitted to the jury; the testimony being susceptible of more than one inference.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Marlboro Cotton Mills, 103 S.E. 512, 114 S.C. 156, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 105 (S.C. 1920).

103 S.E. 512 (Parker v. Marlboro Cotton Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.