Parker v. Macy

Ohio Supreme Court

Parker v. Macy

1 Wright 674, 1 Ohio Ch. 674

DecidedAugust 15, 1834

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 674 (Parker v. Macy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Macy, 1 Wright 674, 1 Ohio Ch. 674 (Ohio 1834).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The declaration is upon a contract to carry from New York to Cleveland. The proof is of a contract made with the Eekford line, not the defendant, and there is no proof from which it can be inferred the defendant is a partner in that company, but the reverse — no case, therefore, is made against the defendant. The case might be different if there was a count in the declaration against the defendant as common carrier, and the plaintiff relied upon the receipt of the goods by the defendant into the Golumbus, and the injury there, but that is not the case before us; there is no such count.

Non suit ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

The declaration is upon a contract to carry from New York to Cleveland. The proof is of a contract made with the Eekford line, not the defendant, and there is no proof from which it can be inferred the defendant is a partner in that company, but the reverse — no case, therefore, is made against the defendant. The case might be different if there was a count in the declaration against the defendant as common carrier, and the plaintiff relied upon the receipt of the goods by the defendant into the Golumbus, and the injury there, but that is not the case before us; there is no such count.

Non suit ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 674, 1 Ohio Ch. 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-macy-ohio-1834.