Parker v. Kenyon

112 Mass. 264
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The mistake in the date of the summons was a defect in the form of the process necessary to bring the defendant before the court; and upon a motion to dismiss for that cause, the decision of the judge presiding in the Superior Court is final. Gen. Sts. c. 115, § 7.

The evidence excluded was immaterial. The trial on the indictment was res inter alios, to which the plaintiff was not a party. And the issue of larceny on that trial was different from the issue of conversion in this action; the one involved a question of intent; the other might be under a claim of right.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Kenyon, 112 Mass. 264 (Mass. 1873).

112 Mass. 264 (Parker v. Kenyon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pilos v. First National Stores Inc.
66 N.E.2d 576 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Silva v. Silva
7 N.E.2d 601 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Bishop v. Donnell
51 N.E. 170 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Kimball v. Sweet
46 N.E. 409 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Fowle v. Child
41 N.E. 291 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Houghton v. Ware
113 Mass. 49 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)