Parker v. Jackson

59 Allen 501
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1850
StatusPublished

This text of 59 Allen 501 (Parker v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Jackson, 59 Allen 501 (Mass. 1850).

Opinion

By the Court.

If the plaintiff wished to have the action entered in this court, she should have entered it at the first term. The statute authorizing appeals to be entered upon petition, at a term subsequent to that appealed to, in certain cases, Rev. Sts. c. 81, § 34, does not apply to this case. In that case, attachments are dissolved and bail discharged, whereas it is very questionable whether they would be, if this cause were to be legally entered and prosecuted. If attachments and bail would not be reinstated by the entry of the action now, its entry would afford the plaintiff little or no advantage over bringing a new action. The reasons applicable to the entry of an appeal after the time do not apply to the case of an original action, when the application for such entry is made by the plaintiff. To allow it to be entered now, would lead to great irregularity The petition must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Allen 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-jackson-mass-1850.