Parker v. Illinois

334 U.S. 816, 68 S. Ct. 1082
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 17, 1948·No. No. 428·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Justice Jackson is of the opinion that the writ of cer-tiorari should be dismissed and did not participate in the [817]*817question as to the disposition of the case on its merits. With respect to the merits the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Petitioner argued the cause and filed a brief pro se. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George F. Barrett, Attorney General.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Illinois, 334 U.S. 816, 68 S. Ct. 1082 (1948).

334 U.S. 816 (Parker v. Illinois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re New Haven Grand Jury
604 F. Supp. 453 (D. Connecticut, 1985)